Cracked Pillars: A Review of Patrick Deneen’s Why Liberalism Failed


By Duncan Evans

It seems everywhere you look in these heated Summer days there’s a piece or a Twitter thread announcing the imminent collapse of liberalism and our coming cultural revolution. As cancel culture burns like wildfire through our institutions of cultural production, mobs topple statues and commercial thoroughfares in America transform into something resembling Belfast on Parade Day, it may be of some use to undertake a measured analysis of Patrick Deneen’s Why Liberalism Failed, a short work of philosophy published just two years ago which argues, in effect, that our present swell of upheaval is the natural end-point of modern liberal thought. His arguments are cogent and compelling, and liberals would do well to weigh them carefully to see if there is truth in them, and if so, what correctives may be applied to roll back the dire conclusions Mr. Deneen leads us to.

The core thrust of Mr Deneen’s argument is that the excision of virtue and community as governing pillars of political thought in the West have generated a polity of hyper-autonomous individuals detached from association, which has led in time to an atomised population sunk in nihilism and decadence and subjugated to an ever-expanding surveillance state.

The earlier chapters of the book set out the basic parameters of the argument by charting the shifts in Western political thought from Ancient Greece until the moderns. In Deneen’s interpretation, ‘the foundational texts of the Western political tradition focused especially on the question how to constrain the impulse to and assertions of tyranny, and characteristically settled upon the cultivation of virtue and self-rule as the key correctives to the tyrannical temptation.’ (Deneen: 22) A just regime depends on a just and righteous citizenry capable of self-mastery, one is not possible without the other and virtue is the inculcating element that binds the two together and extends it from generation to generation. Virtue and its cultivation and propagation, then, is the chief business of political philosophy for the ancients. Deneen further contends that the liberties we tend to associate with modern liberalism were not products of the minds of Locke and Hobbes, but rather have their roots in premodern Christianity. He writes that:

‘The Roman and then medieval Christian philosophical traditions retained the Greek emphasis upon the cultivation of virtue as a central defense against tyranny, but also developed institutional forms that sought to check the power of leaders while (to varying degrees) opening routes to informal and sometimes formal expression of popular opinion in political rule. Many of the institutional forms of government that we today associate with liberalism were at least initially conceived and developed over long centuries preceding the modern age, including constitutionalism, separation of powers, separate spheres of church and state, rights and protections against arbitrary rule, federalism, rule of law, and limited government.’ (Deneen: 23)

Modern liberalism, in Deneen’s interpretation, ‘colonised’ Christian concepts of liberty and recast them into a revolutionary view of human beings, what Deneen terms ‘anthropological individualism.’ By this he means the abstract notion of a particular state of nature upon which must of modern liberal theory is based. In this state, human beings are treated as single units, wholly autonomous and disconnected from one another, acting in rational and detached self-interest. Deneen argues that this was a non-existent fantasy, but one that was brought into being by liberalism. ‘In a reversal of the scientific method, what is advanced as a philosophical set of arguments is then instantiated in reality. The individual as a disembedded, self-interested economic actor didn’t exist in any actual state of nature but rather was the creation of an elaborate intervention by the incipient state in early modernity, at the beginnings of the liberal order.’ (Deneen: 51).

The result is a revolution in human thought, consisting of three basic ideas that together form the core of modern liberalism. These are, to ‘redefine liberty as the liberation of humans from established authority, emancipation from arbitrary custom, culture, tradition, and the expansion of human power and dominion over nature through advancing scientific discovery and economic prosperity.’ (Deneen: 27) The chief effect of this revolution is ‘the loosening of social bonds in nearly every aspect of life – familial, neighborly, communal, religious, and even national,’ which ‘reflects the advancing logic of liberalism and is the source of its deepest instability’ (Deneen: 30). Deneen proceeds to delineate the variations of this instability, from economics to academia, for the remainder of the book.

These chapters present a troubling panorama of life in the West in the early 21st century, but one gets the sense that he is re-treading old ground. Robert Bork’s jeremiad Slouching Towards Gomorrah: Modern Liberalism and American Decline, published in 1996, delineates much of the same chaos and aesthetic degeneracy associated with expressive individualism that preoccupies Deneen. Indeed, the basic argument between the two books is essentially the same. More recently, the novels of Michel Houllebecq give fictional form to the nightmare vision of atomised chaos adumbrated by Bork and Deneen. It can be reasonably said, as such, that Deneen’s work, though precise and brilliantly argued, is not original or particularly insightful.

Furthermore, while there is much to admire in Deneen’s book, there is also much to criticise. Three flaws in Deneen’s thinking come to mind. The first is his contention that the liberties we enjoy today have their roots in medieval Christianity rather than the liberal revolution ushered into the world by England in the 17th century. Deneen is making a specific claim about history, and it’s one that does not hold up to scrutiny. Deneen’s promised land seems to be something resembling a Christian democracy, one in which Christianity serves as the chief source of virtue and the center of community in our democratic polity. His entire philosophical architecture depends upon the claim that Christianity can adequately protect individual liberty, and indeed, that this particular religion served as the West’s true source code for the freedoms we enjoy today. Knock away this argument, and his work begins to look more like theocratic propaganda than a philosophy grounded in the realistic appraisal of history. Deneen does not reference any prime documents or source texts from the medieval period to support his claim, and his chief reference in support of this line of argument is the work of a philosopher named Charles Howard McIlwain. Though Mr. McIlwain’s work may be brilliant, the thought and opinion of one man is insufficient to secure such grand claims. What is demanded are source texts, in which we can clearly see the emergence of liberal thought in medieval Europe. Deneen does not provide these, and one suspects that this is because there is in fact scant evidence for liberal thinking in the Christians who occupied Europe during the dark ages.

Secondly, Deneen’s contention that liberalism dismantles community and enervates association and attachment may be true of our contemporary era, but it was not true for so much of life leading up to our atomised present. It’s a common trick employed by anti-liberal thinkers to make liberalism out to be something that it is not. Liberalism is not licentiousness or hedonism, though these tendencies may be present in a liberal regime. Liberalism is merely a set of procedures and mechanisms designed to balkanise power and prevent the emergence of tyrannical government. Liberalism should not be deified, or treated as a kind of spiritual enterprise. If a liberal state degenerates into hyper-individualism, it seems to me that is less of critique of liberalism than it is the failure of Christianity, or any concurrent spiritual system running alongside liberalism, to galvanise the population and keep a hold over its imagination. The vote to legalise abortion in Ireland demonstrates that Roman Catholicism no longer holds sway over the heart and mind of that remarkable island nation. But is this because of liberalism’s destructive individualism, or perhaps some rot and decadence deep within the Catholic Church which has pushed the Irish into a post-Christian posture?

Finally, there is the problem of alternatives. Perhaps we’re in a transition moment, in which liberalism is being eclipsed by variations of authoritarianism as the common model of government and social relations. We in the West will likely live in authoritarian democracies, with some ostensible allegiance to liberal values, but in practical effect these will be minimal. This is not an original thought or insight. But the thought of it should fills us with terror, because there is no alternative to the liberal regime which is in any way attractive, or at least more attractive than our present liberal condition, even if one admits to its pervasive anomie and brutalised chaos. Whether it is the race-obsessives of the far-left or the far-right, the theocratic zealotry of Salafism, the Orwellianism being built line-by-line in China, all of it is dangerous to human dignity. Bluntly put, better to live in the spiritually deprived wastelands depicted in Houllebecq’s novels than to be a tightly controlled robot in some totalitarian system. The very worst of our liberal system is preferable to the very best of the others. Deneen and his conservative compatriots are sensitive to the lack of purpose and meaning that sits at the heart of a de-Christianised West. It is this deep fear of spiritual nothingness that propells so much conservative criticism of liberalism. It’s a genuine and severe problem and we see its revolutionary effects all around us, particularly in the young. A good many young men and women need purpose and meaning in their lives, to think that they’re fighting for something, some grand enterprise more important than themselves. Those lucky enough to find spiritual satisfaction and meaning in their worklife will be inoculated from these more heated desires. But many don’t, and will look elsewhere for meaning. Some will look for it in radical politics, some in religion, art or war. These last few weeks, we’ve had a glimpse of how this might go. Has there been anything attractive or charming about the last three months or so? Do we really want to trade away what we have at present for some unknown future, to be built presumably by febrile youth? To have being born in the liberal West in the second half of the 20th century is the apotheosis of luck. Most of us luxuriated with the fruits of peace and prosperity without having to bleed for it. This remarkable luck produced its own form of decadence, and we have seen it amplify in this bizarre and terrible year. The stunning lack of gratitude for what we have, the assumption that protected human freedom is the natural way of things, and this unthinking impulse to burn things down with the vague and untested certainty that there’s something better waiting for us over the hill.

Patrick Deneen, 2018, Why Liberalism Failed, Yale University Press, New Haven

Feeling Fresh With Princess Highway

The English Text:

It’s been ages since I’ve written for this blog. Quite a few things directed my attention elsewhere after my long holiday in Europe in April. I planned to write about my fashion experiences in Europe but my plans fell through. I hope to write about Europe in my next post.

This time I want to share my latest experience with some clothes from Princess Highway that display fresh and unique prints.

Continue reading “Feeling Fresh With Princess Highway”

A Christmas Holiday in Review

The English Text:

It always feels like every holiday goes too quickly, even if it is more than a week. So I tried to make it one not easily forgotten by optimising everything, including what I wore during the season and making a note of it. And here in the note I’ll share with you my Fashion experiences.

During this Christmas holiday, I wore clothes from one of my favourite Australian fashion brands, Review. Let me talk a little bit about this brand.

Continue reading “A Christmas Holiday in Review”

A Long Journey: Emily and Fin Dresses from Talis

The English Text:

Last month, November 2, 2018 to be exact, Talis, a fashion shop in Australia that sells fashion products from Europe, held a warehouse clearance sale in a Facebook group called ‘Talis Vintage Style’. Dresses usually priced at $150 were uploaded onto the group at a price of $50. This meant of course that all the members of the Facebook group competed with one another to buy the dresses as quickly as possible. And do you know which products caught my attention the most? Emily and Fin!

Continue reading “A Long Journey: Emily and Fin Dresses from Talis”

100% Cotton For Summer?

The English Text:

The season of summer in Australia officially begins on December 1. However, hot weather can be felt for some days earlier or after that date, depending on which part of the country a person lives in.

I live in a small town in Central Queensland where the summer began a long time before the month of December came along. The hot weather is quite extreme and can reach 42 degrees celsius. I cannot imagine how a person could have survived without AC or a fan in the past. Every time I leave my room, I feel as though I’m in a sauna, but one that is very dry! I start to sweat and feel that my skin is severely threatened.

Continue reading “100% Cotton For Summer?”

THE LEOPARD: A Feminine Animal That Wears a Cloak of Roses?

The English Text:

What do you think when you see clothing with leopard motifs? Are you interested or displeased? If you’re interested, what is the reason, and if not, why?

Just a year ago I still had never considered wearing anything with a leopard motif. I thought this kind of print was too striking and controversial. Like Indonesia’s Durian fruit. There are some who like it a great deal, and there are some who are made queasy by its pungent smell.

However, this last year, I have become very interested in this kind of motif. In the beginning, I did not understand what made me change my mind.

Continue reading “THE LEOPARD: A Feminine Animal That Wears a Cloak of Roses?”

Revisiting Heritage Buildings in Harlequin Dresses

The English Text:

Last weekend, my husband and I enjoyed a short holiday in Brisbane. It’s not a new place for us, but because we presently live in a small town, a visit to a big city is always refreshing.

For me, the most thrilling aspect of visiting a big city like Brisbane is the majestic and artistic old buildings. We revisited some of these buildings and captured them in some images.

Of course I prepared some dresses that I thought might be suitable for the atmosphere of the big city and its majestic architecture. My choice fell to dresses with harlequin motifs that were produced by Pinup Couture.

Continue reading “Revisiting Heritage Buildings in Harlequin Dresses”

Are We Frightened to Grow Old?

(Reading the Poetry of Yeats)

The English Text:

when you are old poem.jpg

I first read the above poem in Indonesian when I was about 19 years old. Without having to re-read it, the poem touched my soul immediately, and pushed me to look for the original verse in English.

It appears this poem was first published in an anthology entitled ‘The Rose’ in 1893, while Yeats was born in the year 1865. The poem ‘When You Are Old’, therefore, was written when Yeats was still quite young.

The poem does not lift up a large subject from the world’s history, but nonetheless concerns a subject that is important to humanity, one that will always cause disquiet in mankind, namely that of age, and aging.

Continue reading “Are We Frightened to Grow Old?”

Are You a Wiggle or a Swing Voter? (Trying Out Elsie Dresses)

Today I threw out a question to my friends on the Facebook group ‘Wear All the Dresses’: “Are you a ‘wiggle’ or a ‘swing’ voter?” Of course what I was referring to was the ‘wiggle’ dress style, like the style in the photo to the right, and the ‘swing’ dress style, like in the photo to the left.

swing and wiggle edited

The results? I was not too surprised by them because they were similar to my predictions. However, I was interested in the reasons that followed.

From some friends who declared their position, 70% chose ‘swing’ and 30% declared a vote for both. This means there was not a single one who chose just the wiggle style. Why?

Continue reading “Are You a Wiggle or a Swing Voter? (Trying Out Elsie Dresses)”

‘Ladies in Black’ and an Imaginative Black Dress From Unique Vintage

Last Tuesday was a day I had looked forward to for some time because a film I wanted to see was playing at the cinema in our small town. The film is entitled ‘Ladies in Black’. I was very enthusiastic to watch the movie because I had heard that this film is set in the 1950s, my favourite era for creativity in fashion. I hope this note will not give away too many spoilers to those of you who haven’t yet seen it.

My husband and I leave for the cinema in the late afternoon, as dinner time approaches. I’m wearing a special black dress just for the film. This dress is in the style of the 1950s, in keeping with the setting of the film. I will discuss the dress in more detail later on in this post.

Pic-2 Ladies in Black

Continue reading “‘Ladies in Black’ and an Imaginative Black Dress From Unique Vintage”